Login or register. (You can now login/register with your social networks.)

Items
Ranged Weapons
Combat
4
4 Votes

15xp


Hits: 1480
Comments: 17
Ideas: 0
Rating: 4
Condition: Normal
ID: 4744

Submitted:

Updated:
January 11, 2008, 4:58 pm

Vote Hall of Honour

You must be a member to use HoH votes.
Author Status

Options


Print Friendly and PDF

EAR-5 Railturret

By:

Combining the stopping power of a gauss weapon, the energy of antimatter, and an unfortunate acronym, the EAR-5 is a potent weapon for both starship combat and pun warfare.

Full Item Description

At the core of it, the EAR-5 (the acronym standing for Explosive Antimatter Railturret) is no different than any other normal gauss weapon built for starship warfare; comprised of an ammunition storage, a loading mechanism, and an extended barrel lined with the electromagnets used to propel the ammunition at a significant fraction of lightspeed at the intended target.

Where it differs from ‘normal’ gauss weaponry is that the EAR-5 loads bolts comprised of antimatter iron; with no macroscale difference in response to electromagnetic fields, the weapon loads and fires just as smoothly as a gauss weapon designed to fire regular-matter rounds. Only the magnetic reinforcement and support fields of the containment and loader give away that this weapon carries much more dangerous ammunition.

History

Designed by the engineers of Gauss Firearms, the EAR line of railguns was born when a former demolitions expert, recently hired by the company, complained that while the rounds fired by the weaponry had plenty of power in terms of penetration, they were distinctly lacking in other aspects. When one of his fellow engineers pointed out the difficulties of loading an explosive payload in a railturret due to the sudden and violent acceleration, the demolitionist simply smiled.

"So make the entire payload explosive. Anti-iron still behave like normal iron in a magnetic field, right?"

The first four models were attempts to ensure the storage and loader mechanisms were capable of handling the violence of shipboard conditions during a fight; the last thing needed was the antimatter rounds being jostled into contact with the normal matter of the ship.

The fifth model appears to have worked out these issues, although the careful handling of the rounds means the weapon fires at only half the rate of a normal ship-mounted railturret.

The acronym, however, has led to a number of stress-induced jokes in the battlefield, most commonly, "Lemme give you an EARfull!"

Properties

-The EAR-5 fires at 1/2 the rate of a normal railturret due to the careful loading procedure.
-The antimatter rounds are designed to maximize contact with the target hull, and are somewhat broader than conventional penetrator rounds.
-The antimatter payload restricts use of the EAR-5 to vacuum combat.



Additional Ideas (0)

Please register to add an idea. It only takes a moment.

Join Now!!



Gain the ability to:
Vote and add your ideas to submissions.
Upvote and give XP to useful comments.
Work on submissions in private or flag them for assistance.
Earn XP and gain levels that give you more site abilities.
Join a Guild in the forums or complete a Quest and level-up your experience.
Comments ( 17 )
Commenters gain extra XP from Author votes.

Voted Cheka Man
January 11, 2008, 17:47
0xp
What happens if you fire it into a planet's atmosphere?
Kassil
January 11, 2008, 17:53
0xp
When it contacts normal matter (such as a planetary atmosphere) it explodes in a nearly-total conversion of mass to energy with the atmospheric gas. The result is a really bright, really high-energy upper-atmosphere detonation with pretty much no lingering radiation. The effects of the blast itself depend on the amount of antimatter involved, the ability of the magnetosphere to turn aside the energy of the blast, and suchlike.

I expect Moon and Siren can both give a better estimation of how much energy would irradiate the planet's visible surface, though.
Chaosmark
January 11, 2008, 19:08
0xp
Upper-atmo nuclear explosion? Kindly let me get off planet first. kthxbai
Kassil
January 12, 2008, 7:12
0xp
Not nuclear; antimatter. There's really a huge difference in the quality of the explosion. Nuclear explosion, you get radiation from the blast, fallout particles, etc. Antimatter reaction, you get a lot less in the way of lingering radiation, because the mass gets converted into pure energy. A lot more bang for your buck, and it doesn't leave things uninhabitable afterwards.
Voted Siren no Orakio
January 11, 2008, 20:05
0xp
E=(gamma)mc^2, yo.

Actually, you'd expect atmospheric bleedoff from contact with the air to be relatively slow. Basically, you get to a point where thermal off-bleed balances out incoming air from a piece. The question is just where that happens...

You surprised me, does that make it my turn, Kassil?
Kassil
January 12, 2008, 7:17
0xp
That is a good point - although considering the velocity of a bolt launched from a ship-mounted railturret in hard vacuum, you might well just get a Column of Hard Energy as it tears down through the atmosphere and bleeds off mass in the process. Could be a hell of a way to sterilize things, really.

And sure, why not?
valadaar
January 12, 2008, 13:51
0xp
Fire a conventional(?) projectile just before the AM one to clear a path to get a closer to the ground detonation.
valadaar
January 12, 2008, 13:52
0xp
Nice weapon, reminds me a litte of my own Fission Cannon.
MoonHunter
January 17, 2008, 10:23
0xp
Drafting only does so much. The air will rush in right after it, you might extend the annialation plume down another hundred or two meters depending on air pressure and other factors.

You also have to remember that space is not empty. There will be interstellar gas particles, dust, and other such that will "degrade" the antimater before it hits the target.
valadaar
October 16, 2013, 9:21
0xp
It rushes in at the speed of sound, so if the projectile is fast enough to hit its target before the tunnel collapses enough to interfere.

Some numbers.

Earth's atmosphere is roughly 100km thick, extremely roughly.

Given that antimatter is expensive as nothing else could be, and having an amount measured in grams is apocalyptic in yield, the projectile would be very small. Say 50mm for our discussion.

We use a powerful laser or other railgun to clear the path for the antimatter projectile. In the case of the laser, lets say a 100mm tunnel is cut. The atmosphere has a distance of 25cm to traverse before slowing down the projectile. Speed of sound is very roughly 340m/second, so it will take ~ .73 milliseconds to collapse the tunnel.

How fast would the projectile have to be to travel 100km in .73 milliseconds?

Um. .45c. The kinetic energy of a 50mm projectile going at .45c - (500g iron sphere) ... 1.2MT
Yield of 500g antimatter = 21.8 MT.

I am amazed when doing numbers like this that although lightspeed is damned fast, the size of the universe does a good job of bringing it down to earth. I had overestimated the power in antimatter as well. A gram of antimatter is 40kt according to this site - http://www.edwardmuller.com/right17.htm


Voted MoonHunter
January 17, 2008, 10:31
0xp
You also have to remember that space is not empty. There will be interstellar gas particles, dust, and other such that will "degrade" the antimater before it hits the target.

Siren how much of the energy conversion will fall into the kinetic in a pure vacuum? If I remember correctly, it should be neglectable.

If there is gas in the way, will that not create a variance? The energy will excite and agitate the gas. This will convert to kinetic, thus creating a shockwave to both alter the path of the projectile and create a dispersed kinetic strike against any target in the gas field?

So reaction jets would be a good thing.

The Sand Caster is a valuable defensive system. (They spray sand as a matter defensive field). Not only do they mess with lasers, they will diffuse (some of) the anti-matter strike.
Kassil
January 17, 2008, 15:56
0xp
Gas and dust is ridiculously thin once you get away from most distinct gravity wells, though; on the order of a long atom every cubic meter. The odds of measurably degrading the bolt in hard vacuum, unless you're utterly insane and fighting with this in the midst of a dark nebula or the like, are negligible; even if you do, the energy release of such a collision, while impressive from the viewpoint of those who have no clue how much energy the building blocks of matter can pack, is fairly minimal. You'd have more concern, I'd think, if you were fighting in the Kuiper Belt or the Oort Cloud, where there may still be moderate amounts of loose material to interfere. But then, again, if you fight in a 'crowded' (from a celestial viewpoint) location, you're either brave or an idiot; in the temperatures out there, the molecular bonds in water get amazingly strong, and I rather doubt many ships want to be hit by steel-hard iceballs wandering along at cometary speeds.

Reaction jets on a gauss weapon - particularly gauss ammunition made of solid antimatter, which would have to be precision-generated without every *touching* the thing - just makes my head hurt, Moon. By the time you can do that with any reliability and not lose labs in the process, you can probably fabricate exotic particles with properties far more useful as weapons - particularly since such a reaction jet would likely need to use antimatter in the jet, which sprays extra mass across the field, which, if you fire these at even half the typically presented rate of a gauss weapon, means you're replacing a normal gas cloud with an antimatter cloud that is much, much more dangerous.

Yes, there should be a variance if you fire it through a dense enough cloud of gas; however, given both the velocities involved and the extreme high-band energies released, you'd likely have more to worry about if you were trying to be stealthy, as firing this through a dense cloud would be much like firing a tracer round, leaving a highly excited trail of gas behind it. Of course, firing antimatter rounds isn't exactly something you do to be stealthy in the first place - that kind of explosion isn't exactly quiet.

And yes, assuming the Sand Caster can push enough material in the way to absorb or deflect the antimatter bolt far enough from the ship as to have it safe despite the released energies, it would be a very good countermeasure.
Siren no Orakio
January 17, 2008, 20:13
0xp
Oy.

No matter what happens, it is still many kilograms of mass moving at a very high speed. Whatever what is between here and there, unless it contain sufficient matter to either completely deflect or annihilate the antimatter projectile, it will strike it's target. This may be slightly less effective than a normal bolt of iron in the immediate strike - A bow-wave of gamma radiation from encountering matter in the path will, simultaneously, bleed off a small amount of kinetic energy from the piece, and serve to 'push' further intervening dust/light particulates from the path. Remember, even photons have a pressure associated with them, even if it is very low. You can use light to turn a propeller, you can use light to sail a starship. A pulse of really BRIGHT light may as well be an explosion. It bears all the same characteristics thereof.

If the target is really lucky, they're a small enough vehicle that this can punch through, with the addition of a lot of extra radiation and heat during the strike. If they're unlucky, it lodges. And it starts to react. Let me say this a few times, for emphasis: Solid Antimatter takes a long time to react with surrounding matter. Solid antimatter cannot immediately react in its entirety with local matter. The required distance between matter and antimatter for their mutual annihilation is extremely intimate, properly measured in the Planck Length, the smallest distance the universe itself bothers to track(Side note). Because of this, unless the antimatter projectile becomes lodged in a target, the majority of reaction will be between the positron shell structure of the anti-iron with the electrons of any near-by matter. This annihilation alone will suffice to push away fine particulate dust. The true ugly happens when the anti-iron becomes lodged in another piece of iron, and e+/e- annihilation is no longer sufficient to push it away. As the p/n pairs start annihilating, energy release will go up by a approximately 3 orders of magnitude, very likely causing the anti-iron to melt or vaporise, freeing it to pair annihilate more quickly, rapidly increasing the explosion's magnitude.

Side Note: Planck's Length is one potential answer to Zeno's Dichotomy Paradox, by denying the infinite divisibility of true space, we place a functioning limit on the infinite sum, making the full sum calculable by simple arithmetic means. Blam.
MoonHunter
January 18, 2008, 12:42
0xp
Kassil: Reaction Jets and Sand Casters would use conventional matter, not exotic matters. They will just produce "stuff" that will impact/ degrade the anti-mater some. Reaction jets because you will be manuvering in this environment will expell dense gas; Sand Casters because they are anti weapon systems spreading sand in a dense cloud. They both are (dirt) cheap anti-systems for anti-mater weapons (and sand casters are anti-laser defenders and can double as emergency reaction engines).

If you add something that will react and apply kinetic explosion/ reactions when high energy reactions occur around it it becomes more effective. These are not perfect anti weapons, but they will but a dent in them. And they are a ton cheaper than an antimater shell.

You might also have a remote that flies near your ship that will pull as an electromagnet helping to deflect these things (and other rail weapon rounds).

Besides, what about a laser tracking system that will simply shoot the thing as it is incomming.

There are always lovely (and cheap) anti weapons. systems.
EchoMirage
January 21, 2008, 6:06
0xp
I can picture that ammo for the EAR would cost a fortune; especially if it is fired in full auto, as the submission suggests.

Also, stray bullets would be a serious problem - they can stay as 'mines' on the battlefield long after the conflict has faded.
Voted Scrasamax
August 22, 2012, 1:15
0xp
the comment thread on this submission is what makes this really worth reading.
valadaar
October 16, 2013, 8:43
0xp
Agreed! Comment Awesomeness!

Regions

Freetext



Random Idea Seed View All Idea Seeds

       By: Strolen

Marraige custom. The groom must prove his worth to the friends, family, and future wife. The best man is obligated to challenge the groom to a duel and the best man chooses the weapons. (can be anything, toothpicks, cotton balls, anything) If the groom wins then he proves his worth. If he loses then the bride will accept him for his faults and could sometimes gives him a task to accomplish before the wedding.

Ideas  ( Society/ Organization ) | February 15, 2003 | View | UpVote 0xp


Creative Commons License
Individual submissions, unless otherwise noted by the author, are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
and requires a link back to the original.

We would love it if you left a comment when you use an idea!
PayPal
Powered by Lockmor 4.1 with Codeigniter | Copyright © 2013 Strolen's Citadel
A Role Player's Creative Workshop.
Read. Post. Play.
Optimized for anything except IE.
0.0225