Articles
Humor/ Editorial
Gaming - In General

Stub


3xp


Hits: 2376
Comments: 0
Ideas: 0
Rating: 0
Condition: Stub
ID: 3947

Submitted:

Updated:
June 1, 2007, 7:10 pm

Author Status

Options


Worlds versus Planets

By:

So what is the difference between worlds and planets?

(This is a support stub for the Worlds and Planets submission.)

Easier to define is a planet. Quoting Wikipedia, as defined by the International Astronomical Union (IAU), it is a celestial body orbiting a star or stellar remnant that is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, not massive enough to cause thermonuclear fusion in its core, and has cleared its neighbouring region of planetesimals.

Science aside, we approximately know what a planet is. What I call a world in this context, is (usually) a planet, inhabited by creatures of some intelligence, that have developed some degree of civilization. So our theoretical space-travelers would land on a planet, but visit a world, if you take my meaning (as a civilization usually trumps any interesting local features).

Now that I have some definitions, does this mean these are the only places fitting Worlds and Planets? Heck no!

First the obvious - there can be planets that are not worlds, as there are many more reasons to visit a place than pretty female aliens. Sadly the reasons are mostly scientifical. :)

Also, there can be worlds that are not planets… and here you can let your imagination run wild. Off the top of my hat, think Ringworld, or those extremely cold stars that could actually house organic lifeforms.

But note also the potential loopholes in the definitions - large moons of other planets may qualify as planet-like enough (consider Triton). Also, what if a ‘planet’ is not orbiting a star at all, even indirectly, but instead roaming the vastness of space on its own?

Well, you can probably get away with many a deviation here. But of course, the more exotic a post is, the more it deserves its own submissions.

See you planetside!



Additional Ideas (0)

Please register to add an idea. It only takes a moment.

Join Now!!



Gain the ability to:
Vote and add your ideas to submissions.
Upvote and give XP to useful comments.
Work on submissions in private or flag them for assistance.
Earn XP and gain levels that give you more site abilities.
Join a Guild in the forums or complete a Quest and level-up your experience.
Comments ( 0 )
Commenters gain extra XP from Author votes.

There be no comments on 'dis here submission.



Random Idea Seed View All Idea Seeds

Only deadly weapons allowed

       By: Cheka Man

A certain country allows most civilians to carry weapons, but only if they are potentially deadly. Pepper sprays, stun guns/tasers, batons, and dart guns are banned. And if you kill someone and are not acquitted at trial, the punishment is to be hanged the day after you were found guilty. The message here is that if you want to go armed, you had better be prepared to risk killing someone and being executed unless it was clearly self defense.

When it comes to combat spells, again, only the highly dangerous can legally be cast with the same possible consequences if cast wrongly.

Encounter  ( Any ) | November 27, 2016 | View | UpVote 3xp


Creative Commons License
Individual submissions, unless otherwise noted by the author, are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
and requires a link back to the original.

We would love it if you left a comment when you use an idea!
PayPal
Powered by Lockmor 4.1 with Codeigniter | Copyright © 2013 Strolen's Citadel
A Role Player's Creative Workshop.
Read. Post. Play.
Optimized for anything except IE.
0.0270