Login or register. (You can now login/register with your social networks.)

Articles
Humor/ Editorial
Citadel Help
4.5
8 Votes

55xp


Hits: 180
Comments: 10
Ideas: 0
Rating: 4.5
Condition: Normal
ID: 7740

Submitted:

Updated:
February 23, 2014, 8:35 am

Vote Hall of Honour

You must be a member to use HoH votes.
Author Status

Options


Print Friendly and PDF

7 Things About Criticism

By:

Criticism can be a very powerful and valuable tool if you understand how to give it, and more importantly, how to accept it.

Constructive/Destructive

There are two sorts of criticism, constructive and destructive. There is really only one thing to say about destructive criticism, and that is to ignore it. The following 7 Things deals with giving and accepting beneficial and constructive criticism.

Intention:

The intent of constructive criticism is to improve, and build upon something someone else has done.

  • read read, snag, that's not right, that needs to be fixed!

Communication:

Communication is very often a lost art, and what we mean to say, what we actually write, and what out subject reads can be three completely different things. Poor communication on a basic level very quickly leads to hostility and hurt feelings on both sides.

  • I like what you have written, and I am not attacking you, but what you have written could be better.

Expression:

Where communication is HOW we say, Expression is WHAT we say. It is obvious, or should be obvious, that honesty and sincerity are vital, but these are functions of communication. Expression is the old writer's adage of Show, don't Tell.

  • It is easy for a criticism to be taken personally, and it is just as easy to make a critique into a personal issue. I have seen a writer who dealt with dyslexia be brought to tears by three words on a critique: Learn to spell.

Definition:

Criticism isn't the place for vague statements. Go to the issue, point out the problem, identify it.

  • This can be as basic as pointing out typos, to as involved as referencing contradictory information, identifying elements of literature inside the context of the writing or locating discrepancies or misfits in thematic structure.

Gratification:

In handing out criticism it is important to remind, or keep in mind that the reason behind the criticism is that at heart, you like what you have read, or you see something of value in it, and want to help the writer make it better. (Unless you're beating a dead horse, and your criticism is negative, and probably moves over into the destructive category)

  • I enjoy your writing style, or the subject matter, or the genre that you are writing in. Also, pointing out positives and things that were liked can take the sting out of other critical observations, which in turn makes the entire exchange function more smoothly.

Direction:

Where do we go from here? The problem has been identified, but pointing out problems is only half of criticism, the other half is if not offering the solutions, pointing out where those solutions might be.

  • Pointing out solutions to problems are as specific as the problems themselves. This could be as simple as spell check, to as involved as pointing out that some aspect of the origin is missing, a logical conclusion doesn't make sense, or other means of improvement.

Reflection:

What will the result of the criticism? Will the changes and questions be addressed? Or will the tone and subtext of the critique simply be ignored, or spark hostility.

  • By editing, or rewriting, or reconsidering X, it will pull the piece together, promote synergy, and avoid the potential of seeing a good idea fall because of what is either a minor issue, or a major one that was hiding in the writer's blind spot.


Additional Ideas (0)

Please register to add an idea. It only takes a moment.

Join Now!!



Gain the ability to:
Vote and add your ideas to submissions.
Upvote and give XP to useful comments.
Work on submissions in private or flag them for assistance.
Earn XP and gain levels that give you more site abilities.
Join a Guild in the forums or complete a Quest and level-up your experience.
Comments ( 10 )
Commenters gain extra XP from Author votes.

Voted axlerowes
February 23, 2014, 9:16
0xp
amen
Voted Cheka Man
February 23, 2014, 11:51
0xp
Another 5/5 for you.
Voted caesar193
February 23, 2014, 17:04
0xp
Just a typo: the first sentence of the Reflection section should end with a 'be.' As in, "what will the result of the criticism BE?" Other than this, everything was excellent, which I now know I must add to make sure my typo bit is well-received ;). Still, I'm afraid this just isn't a 5/5 for me. Maybe if you provided some example maybe of each type, or dos and don'ts for each section, I could revisit my vote. In short, more material.

Still, this was an excellent adress of the topic, and I hope this criticism follows the above parameters.
Scrasamax
February 23, 2014, 19:25
0xp
I considered adding examples but opted to keep this a short and focused piece.
Voted Longspeak
February 23, 2014, 20:46
0xp
Excellent. Gets right into the heart of what can go wrong in critiquing the work of others, and provides important suggestions for expressing constructive critiques.
Voted Stork
February 25, 2014, 20:26
0xp
Constructive criticism is much needed thing in this world(as in earth present day) but not well executed by most and not well accepted by most either. At least it seems that way to me.

This is a good read as a general guild line and I think that everyone should read it. It could only help in the long run.

After all, hurt feelings will only lessen the value of the piece in question and push people back (or worse yet) away from the potential of growing personally.
Scrasamax
February 25, 2014, 22:51
1xp
The main thing that I think of is that you don't have to hit all seven points to have a constructive criticism, but it should ideally make you aware of how you critique, and how you could be more effective. Some people come across as very adversarial in their delivery, while others can end up being unhelpfully vague.
Voted Dozus
February 26, 2014, 7:07
0xp
All commentors and submitters should read this monthly to remind themselves what good criticism is, and what to do with criticism. Those periodic times when people forget one or the other tend to cause offense to be taken unnecessarily, and nobody likes that.
Voted Murometz
February 26, 2014, 10:12
0xp
Well-worded. Helpful. Gives one something to think about before typing out a comment.
Voted JaidalynNailo
March 6, 2014, 12:56
Only voted

Freetext



Random Idea Seed View All Idea Seeds

       By: Almar

While setting up camp for the night, the PC's are aproached by another group of adventurers who seem nice enough. The road is somewhat dangerous and the other group suggests camping together. The two bands split watches, one adventurer from each group watching at once. The night goes by without incident, the next day the PC's travel with the other group as they are going the same way.

The group consists of Hordel the ranger, who is skilled with the bow. Hordel is a quiet man who speaks little but appears quite skilled. Dremar is a barbarian who is a little excentric, he seems to be an excasive drinker and thiunk that battle is the solution to everything. He appears to be a stout and powerful fighter with his greataxe. Ferrin is the leader of the group, a rouge by trade. He is daft and witty, speaking with the PCs often and asking many questions. He fights with finesse with his rapier. Preminitat as a cleric but he will not say which god he worships. He uses his spells to empower and heal his party and fights with a club. He sticks close to Ferrin. Ferrin is a great talker and tells much of himself and his party, but asks even more about the history and capabilities of the PCs. He tells of some adventures his party has had, and they seem like an interesting group of mercenaries. Hordel is quite and has little interest in speaking with the PCs, he ignores most questions. He spends a lot of time with Dremar and sometimes Ferrin. Dremar seems to not care about any questions ansked to him, nor does he seem to know the answers. He seems battle hardened and is a simple man. Preminitat rarely starts conversations but will speak with the PCs. However, some of his accounts of the party's history seem to condradict those of Ferrin.

The Party spends another night and day with Ferrin's group. One of four things can happen on the third night.
1: While eating dinner around the fire, Ferrin gets into an argument with one of the PCs when he/she mentions the discepincies between Ferrin's stories and Preminitat's.
2: Hordel gets mad after repeated questioning about his life from the PCs.
3. Preminitat gets mad after repeated questioning from the PCs about what god he worships.
4: One of the PCs rejects the offer of a drink from Dremar and he takes it as an insult.
All of these scenarios result in a battle between the parties. If Ferrin's party is defeated and still lives he swears vengance. His party may then cross paths with the adventurers again.

Encounter  ( Locations ) | November 15, 2003 | View | UpVote 0xp


Creative Commons License
Individual submissions, unless otherwise noted by the author, are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
and requires a link back to the original.

We would love it if you left a comment when you use an idea!
PayPal
Powered by Lockmor 4.1 with Codeigniter | Copyright © 2013 Strolen's Citadel
A Role Player's Creative Workshop.
Read. Post. Play.
Optimized for anything except IE.
0.0206