Strolen\s Citadel content. 
The Road
Locations  (TransWorld)   (Any)
MoonHunter's comment on 2007-05-25 01:04 AM
More shameless bumping. Go to Comment
The Road
Locations  (TransWorld)   (Any)
MoonHunter's comment on 2008-09-09 11:10 PM
Updated: Updated for some very bad capitalization mistakes. Go to Comment
The Road
Locations  (TransWorld)   (Any)
MoonHunter's comment on 2008-09-09 11:11 PM
One should read Roadmarks. It is some fun popcorn for the mind.

The Amber Series (first seven) really should be read by any serious sci-fi fantasy fan, just like you should read The Lord of the Rings. Go to Comment
The Road
Locations  (TransWorld)   (Any)
MoonHunter's comment on 2008-03-03 03:50 PM
An Addition

Up the Road a little way from Now, you will find a number of offramps for The City. In fact, you can see The City from the Road, even if you don't stop.

The Road is a central point on the Multiversal Web of HappenTracks and WorldLines. Some would call it Cynosure, while others would call it The Only City. From the City, you can travel to just about anysphere or realm in the 'Verse. Go to Comment
The Road
Locations  (TransWorld)   (Any)
Scrasamax's comment on 2008-02-02 12:43 AM
Aside from being The Attack of the Parentheses, this is a fairly nice submission. I like the road analogy for time traveling, though I must admit I've not read Amber or Zelazny so I'll have to take your word on it ;) Go to Comment
The Road
Locations  (TransWorld)   (Any)
axlerowes's comment on 2009-10-30 03:46 PM
Nice enough idea. Go to Comment
The Road
Locations  (TransWorld)   (Any)
Moonlake's comment on 2013-07-05 11:25 PM
Quite nice concept, simple but having great utility uses. Go to Comment
Well of FireGems
Items  (Other)   (Campaign Defining)
MoonHunter's comment on 2005-02-24 08:36 AM
And we disincline against swords because we have seen them before and they are cliche?

These four posts are best seen together. Any one, by itself, is fairly useless. It is is only when seen in combination that they make sense. Go to Comment
Well of FireGems
Items  (Other)   (Campaign Defining)
MoonHunter's comment on 2005-03-01 08:13 AM
This Piece, like a few others, requires back story. The four posts put together are really one entry - accessible from four directions. Go to Comment
Well of FireGems
Items  (Other)   (Campaign Defining)
MoonHunter's comment on 2006-01-22 02:32 PM
I need to write up the NPCs associated with the Order of the Flames post. Go to Comment
Well of FireGems
Items  (Other)   (Campaign Defining)
Ancient Gamer's comment on 2005-02-21 10:22 PM
3/5 because of the sketchy appeance. It would not be difficult to use it as a template. The general idea on the main site, however, seems to be to provide a thorough background (for the item, as well as the organization).

In addition: there is too much of an "Excalibur look and feel" about the item for my taste. Altars are cool and invaluable, but these have been seen before in other incarnations. (The aforementioned Excalibur (in its stone), the Dragon orbs of Krynn/Dragonlance(resting on their altar/pedestal), etc...) Go to Comment
Well of FireGems
Items  (Other)   (Campaign Defining)
Ancient Gamer's comment on 2005-02-25 09:10 AM
:)

I must admit that a sword is prone to getting lower grades from me, exactly because they are so difficult to make original. I think there are very few swords that has not already been made in a 1000 incarnations.

So such items lose their 1 point for originality. The last point (4->5) I reserve for truly spectacular items.

Nothing wrong with a 3. I just stated why I voted as I did. I hate when there is no feedback to an item. Everyone ought to get feedback. Go to Comment
Well of FireGems
Items  (Other)   (Campaign Defining)
valadaar's comment on 2006-10-15 07:06 PM
Holding off vote for now - perhaps this bumb will trigger the unification of the subs! :) Go to Comment
Well of FireGems
Items  (Other)   (Campaign Defining)
tinypoisonousfish's comment on 2010-06-20 06:55 PM

Interesting if typical fantasy device but, well, too vanilla. This needs editing and a rewrite before I'd even give it a vote. Of all the related subs, the fire gems were the strongest in this regard, but it still doesn't make these entries seem any less plain. Needs another pass. Go to Comment
FireGems
Items  (Jewelry)   (Campaign Defining)
MoonHunter's comment on 2005-03-01 08:14 AM
This post is really nothing without the others. All four posts that are linked together are required to be viewed before any of them make great sense. In reality, they are one post with four different ways to access it. Go to Comment
FireGems
Items  (Jewelry)   (Campaign Defining)
Ancient Gamer's comment on 2005-02-21 10:23 PM
These gems caught my fancy! While they are not ingenious, they certainly awoke my imagination. A solid 4/5 Go to Comment
FireGems
Items  (Jewelry)   (Campaign Defining)
KendraHeart's comment on 2005-09-30 01:41 PM
This is kind of cool. Dragon riding Lensmen. Jedi-sh. Then again, all sorts of mystic knights kind of run together. Where is the campaign setting for these? Are you running it somewhere? Go to Comment
FireGems
Items  (Jewelry)   (Campaign Defining)
valadaar's comment on 2013-04-29 08:42 PM
A good plot device. Go to Comment
FireGems
Items  (Jewelry)   (Campaign Defining)
Stephie's comment on 2008-03-31 11:45 PM
Very good work on these opals. Go to Comment
Master Simonus
NPCs  (Minor)   (Political)
Ria Hawk's comment on 2006-04-16 04:35 PM
Oh, I like him. He's got so many possibilities, and I can well imagine that some of his various enemies are driven to distraction by him. The inevitable assassination attempts would be interesting, since he's like this all the time. He reminds me a lot of Captain Jack Sparrow, only without the associated exaggerated ego. He WILL be used. Go to Comment
Total Comments:
6408

Join Now!!




Fatal error: Call to undefined function top_menu() in /home/strolen/public_html/lockmor/application/views/citadel/vfooter.php on line 2