Sigurd: The blade doesn't glow. Go re-read the description. What it does is strip the ability to see shadows from you - so you can see however far you would under full daylight. To the person using this blade, there *is* no dark to see in, and the blade corrects your eyesight to a perfect 20/20... Which is all stated in the item description, which I'm guessing you didn't read. Go to Comment
The first ability would be pretty useless to those with already clear vision, though it would help sharpen people eyesight, perhaps. The second ability is perfect for assassinations or thievery. An assassin can douse the light in a large hall, plunging it into pitch-black, then run up to the main table, kill the head figure and leave without tripping on anything or bumping into anyone.
A nice dagger. I would have liked a bit more depth on the background, but its all sound as it is.
A downside to the not seeing shadows would be that the thief/assassin wouldn't be able to see his own shadow. Now if he doused every light in his way tha wouldn't be so bad, but if he didn't, and he cast a shadow the guards would know he was there and he would have to leave, quickly. Good weapon, good reason to exist.
Not bad, not bad at all. A bit cliche' with the "owner loving item obsessively", but 'tis creative about it, and a very interesting item. This would be good for bards obviously, but if not carefully controlled it might become a problem with overpowerment...But a good GM shouldn't have any problems with that sort of thing.
Solid item with open-ended (aka DM controlled) powers. I think it would be very nice to make it clear to the PC this was dangerous, but not give him/her what was possible... the PCs might be afraid to use it even to do simple things like light a campfire... that's a great way to control it.. better than actually punishing them for overuse is to make them so afraid they dont use it much ;-p Go to Comment
Might have to change the creation of it a little bit. I like it overall though. But why would a wizard create such an item and then have it hidden away? Perhaps (s)he just wanted to see if it could be done. Plausible, but unlikely.
What was the original purpose of it. It is alluded that it was a tool, but what kind of tool, for what purpose, and why wasn't it used when the kingdom started failing? Just some curiosity I have. Powerful weapons need a good history, and I like this item and want the history. Go to Comment
Sounds like somebody needs a way to breech the wall first to even get to it.
Beyond that detail, I like the idea. The staff may be able to sense something outside the wall and may let the players enter so it can delay them and even provide them with safe areas to recover in untill it can work it's influence over them as well. Go to Comment
It projects the wall at will; unless it feels it has a need to keep something in or out, things can pass freely in and out, all the way down to where the staff itself is. Granted, this is something like five or six levels of dungeons, filled with all kinds of low-to-mid intelligence creatures which may well seek to keep adventurers away. Go to Comment
The staff's creation as it is wasn't intentional. The wizard who made it had a knack for creating items that weren't quite 'right'.
The staff is no exception. When he realized that the staff wasa greater danger than he'd intended. I had the power to gradually charm and change those within the area of power around it; originally this charm was for whoever held it, but since developing an awareness it has changed to alleigance to the staff itself.
As for why it wasn't used - the kingdom, I think, was likely overrun - quite possibly by a marauding tribe from the wastelands; by the time they realized the staff's power would be useful, the archmage was dead, and without his powe, the staff was sealed solidly into the stone.
Breaking the staff - if it could be managed - would be interesting, as the entire population of the dungeon would suddenly be free-willed, and quite a bit smarter than mere beasts; there'd also likely be an explosion of incredible force, as all the energy that staff contains explodes outward again. However, to destroy it truly, you'd have to destroy the gem - and that's likely to take something akin to a volcano's heart with a dwarven hammer. Go to Comment
It's meant to be an item /or/ a villain, actually. It might concievably think of a way to free itself, and end up in the hands of someone resistant to the charm power it holds. Or it might get a body built for itself somehow. Go to Comment
A common mistake when writing adventures set in deserts is to assume that the climate is too ferociously hot to wear armor. Historically, most battles in deserts involved troops dressed in protective armor. Although they would have been miserable during the hottest part of the day or the hottest part of the year, desert weather isn't intolerably hot 24/7.